05 May 2012

WE DODGED THE BULLET THIS TIME


but will we be as lucky next time?

      More importantly, will we be prepared? On March 8th of this year, The largest solar storm since 2007 sent electronic destruction showering down upon all of us mere mortals at over 2 million miles an hour. According to NASA, in the worst-case scenario, this solar storm could: ” disrupt power grids, radio communications, and GPS as well as spark dazzling auroras.1 ” Fortunately, it didn't. A little over 150 years ago, a similar-but much more powerful storm hit earth. If that same storm happened today, “modern life could come to a standstill 1 ” During the 1859 flare “...U.S. telegraph operators reported sparks leaping from their equipment—some bad enough to set fires, said Ed Cliver, a space physicist at the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory in Bedford, Massachusetts.



















A visually spectacular flare being thrown out on April 16, 2012.
 
      Think about it. In the year 2012, how much of our life is totally dependent on satellites and microchips? Without them, your cell phone would be worthless. Cable TV would be history. Our military would be back to WWII-type fighting. Although some small, older airplanes will still get off the ground most of our modern aircraft couldn't fly. Absolutely nothing with modern avionics would be working. Your microwave oven and maybe even your coffee pot wouldn't work.

      Do your coffee pot and microwave depend on a satellite? No, but they ARE run by microchips. Anything that depends on computers or anything else built with microchips could cease to function. And a solar flare isn't the only culprit capable of sending us back to the dark ages. Let a large EMP (see below) fire over north America and my 39 year-old truck would coast to a stand-still because the electronic ignition would be fried. Our water, electricity, natural gas and even our sewers are completely or primarily computer controlled. You couldn't even flush your toilet twice.

      An EMP (electromagnetic pulse2) from even a small nuclear explosion could, in the words of the Office of Radiation Protection3destroy most of the electronics that were not protected in the entire Continental United States. 
     After this effect was discovered by accident, governments all over the world began figure out how to “harden3” critical infrastructures against an EMP. That was a major push behind the development of the internet4. Various institutions around the country wanted to be able to communicate even if a few cities were already nuked.

      So what can we do to protect ourselves? Are there any measures that we can take to make sure that our families and ourselves will make it through a large solar flare or EMP?

      Let's face it; the government is going to do or not do whatever they feel like. And they're probably not going to tell us no matter what they do. For our personal protection, we're on our own and, although nowhere near impossible, it's going to be a bit more difficult than you might think. These days, almost everything is digital and that means microchips.

      Let's start with just day-to-day living. We need a roof over our head, food, water, heat and sanitation. The house is simple, but you need to heat and/or cool it. You need to store and cook food. You need to wash clothes...and yourself. And you need to use the camode on a regular basis.

      You may already have a wood stove and if you're out in the country you might have a well and even an old outhouse. If you live in the 'burbs, you're dependent on city water and sewer. Even in the country, without electricity your well isn't going to work unless you put in a hand pump. The fan for your furnace or wood stove won't blow any air and you can forget about the air conditioner.

      To prepare for a 2 to 4 week total power outage, you'll need to get some water stored; about 1 to 2 gallons per person per day or about 200 to 250 gallons for a family of 4 5. More is better. Any large bucket or basin will work for personal washing and you can do laundry by hand in the bathtub. Yes! I know. It sounds hillbilly, but it can be done. I've done it.

Believe it or not, everything you need to survive with no power grid is readily available close to home and fairly affordable. You can pick up a porta-potty for camping at the local sporting goods store or even at K-Mart or Wal Mart. They come with disposable bags which you tie up and store; preferably a long way from where you sleep and eat. A Coleman stove and a few tanks of fuel will set you back about $75 and you're set for cooking.

      For electrical conveniences you can't beat a 12 volt system. At the local travel trailer outlet, you can get all kinds of lights, fans and even a small refrigerator or cooler that run on 12 volts. Marine outlets also have pretty much anything you'll need as many pleasure boats are totally on a 12V system. Truck stops carry an amazing array of 12V goodies, too. A couple of car batteries, a few cans of gas and a small generator to charge the batteries and you're at least able to make life bearable. Don't try to use the generator to run any of your regular, 120 volt household appliances. Most wont run anyway and the ones that do will use up your precious fuel at a ridiculous rate. Just do the minimum to get by until the infrastructure is back up and running. Of course, all of this is easier if you live in the country with ample storage room but no matter where you live; even a small apartment, you can make some affordable and relatively simple preparations. You don't need a tinfoil hat. And if nothing happens, you're all set for your next camping trip.

      A word about safety. Under no conditions should you run a propane, gas or diesel space heater indoors. You'll kill yourself. If you don't have a wood stove install one, move to a warmer climate or stock up on blankets. In an emergency, you can start a small campfire in the garage on the concrete floor. Just make sure you open the door and a window enough to ventilate the smoke. It ain't purty but it'll keep you and the wife and kids from freezing to death.

      Communication and transportation are a completely different set of challenges. With no Cell phones or satellites and the phone grid down, you're not going to call, email, Skype or text anyone. They couldn't answer, anyway. I hate to say it, but communications will be back to early 1800s level. At least for awhile. Yo can get some walkie-talkies for short-range communication and protect them from an EMP6. Just make sure you can recharge them with your generator. Local telegraphs will probably get set up in a couple of weeks for law enforcement and military use but as for you and I, we'll be limited talking to people we see on the street. Deal with it.

      Transportation is a bit easier. There's always that old stand-by - the bicycle for short runs and visiting the neighbors. Just think of all the exercise you'll be getting. Work off those love handles. For longer trips or to carry more stuff, you'll have to put some gasoline off to the side and have a vehicle that doesn't use a computer or electronic ignition. Most scooters and older motorcycles will fit the bill. If you need a car or truck, you'll either have to buy a pre-70s model or do a conversion on your current ride. For a lot of newer cars, that will be somewhere between prohibitive and impossible. Sorry!

      Oh yeah. Use up your emergency gas and re-fill the supply every couple of weeks to keep it fresh. Gas gets stale after about 90 days. There are additives you can buy that will stretch it, but fresher is better.

      Our government as well as quite a few private concerns are actually putting a lot of thought into preparations for a solar flare7, and during the cold war we (the USA) and other countries put a lot of critical equipment underground to protect it from EMPs and radiation. Most of it is very hush-hush but they are at least thinking about it.

      If you've watched all the post-apocalypse movies like I have, you could get really discouraged about the possibilities of rebuilding our society after a major flare or nuclear war. The war would bring a whole new set of problems but in the case of a massive flare or for the survivors of a nuclear conflict, I don't personally believe that the future would be all that bleak. Humans are resilient and resourceful We will band together to make it through the initial shock and rebuild our society fairly quickly. It won't take anywhere as long as it took us the first time to get where we are now. We've already developed all the know how. We just have to put it to work.

      Like the Boy Scout motto tells us to do: Be Prepared!!! Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.

And for the hats, I hear that tinfoil is on sale at the local supermarket.

At least, that's my opinion. What's yours?.

For more information on setting up a home for 12 volts and other preparations, here are some sites and books to get you going.
Books
12-volt guide book by TECHSTAR
Living on 12 Volts with Ample Power by David Smead & Ruth Ishiarn

12 Volt Solar Power by Michel Daniek



Sites









Citations



If you wish to unsubscribe from this blog, please send an email to pyrate02@gmail.com with the word “UNSUBSCRIBE”in the subject line.

07 April 2012

Happy Birthday, Tucker

He turned 12 years old in April.
He is a constant companion and good friend.
We love you, buddy.

05 April 2012

HAVE YOU LOST YOUR HOME YET?


WHAT THE HOUSING CRISIS REALLY MEANS


    Just how bad is the US housing crisis? More importantly, how does it – or will it affect you? I can't answer that for you personally since each person's situation is different and anybody's situation can change overnight. What I can do is show you what has happened and what that means for the future.

    The bottom line is this; most people are either in some level foreclosure, or know someone that has or is about to lose their home. Think about it for a minute. Who do you know that is 90 or more days behind on their mortgage or has already lost their home? According to Time Magazine (Feb 12, 2012) 22% of home-owners are upside down in their mortgages. That means they owe more on their mortgage than their home is worth and, as such couldn't sell it if they had to.

    I live in Billings, Montana; a typical mid-size city. According to the US Census Bureau1, Montana had an estimated population of 998,119 in 2011. About 104,000 of those live in Billings. The Census Bureau also says that about 66% of families own their own home. In Billings, that would be about 68,640 people. If each family averages 2.59 members then there about 26,501 private homes in Billings.
    MainStreet.com3 said:”A total of 2,698,967 properties entered some stage of foreclosure – default notice, scheduled auction or bank repossession – last year.” That (according to them) was 1 in 69. In Billings, that would be about 304 homes in some stage of foreclosure. Los Angeles county has a population a little shy of 10 million, which would mean about 56 THOUSAND families that have lost or will lose their home in LA. You can do the math for your city. 
    And what is the prognosis? Will things get better or worse? To answer that, we need to know what caused the disaster in the first place. Why did the bubble burst? Was it the Republicans? The Democrats? Greedy Wall Street Moguls or the Evil Bankers? Did Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac just start taking people's homes?
    I think that, when pressed, few people can trace the roots back to where it started. Most people that I know don't realize that the base causes stem from President Jimmy Carter's administration and the the Community Reinvestment Act4 (CRA), enacted by Congress in 1977.

    The CRA, in a nutshell, directed banks to loan money to people to buy homes. Whether those people could afford them or not. And two government institutions known as Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac guaranteed those loans. Many of the loans were adjustable rate. That means that every so often, your interest rate can go up or down. They rarely go down.
    When the economy began to tank after the internet bubble burst, the interest rates went up to more than the original payment. Then the payments went up to more than many people could afford. People had to get out from under their mortgages so a lot of houses went on the market all at once. The ever-present law of supply and demand kicked in. More houses for sale meant lower prices and suddenly a whole lot of people owed more on their homes than they were worth. They couldn't sell them and they couldn't afford the payments. The only thing left is foreclosure.
    That's the short version. Follow the links for the long version.

   And just who are Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac? Why do they have anything to do with your house?
    According to Wikipedia, “The Federal National Mortgage Association, commonly known as Fannie Mae, was founded in 1938 during the Great Depression as part of the New Deal...The corporation's purpose is to expand the secondary mortgage market by securitizing mortgages in the form of mortgage-backed securities (MBS),[3] allowing lenders to reinvest their assets into more lending and in effect increasing the number of lenders in the mortgage market by reducing the reliance on thrifts5.
    About Freddy Mac, Wikipedia says “The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), known as Freddie Mac, is a public government sponsored enterprise (GSE)...The FHLMC was created in 1970 to expand the secondary market for mortgages in the US. Along with other GSEs, Freddie Mac buys mortgages on the secondary market, pools them, and sells them as a mortgage-backed security to investors on the open market.”

    The fact that, as of 1970, we have two government-run and non-elected agencies doing the same job at twice the cost and twice the confusion is another story. Here's what it means as far as the housing crisis.
    John Q. Bluecollar takes out a mortgage down at his local bank. Fannie Mae &/or Freddy Mac step up; purchase that loan from the bank, put it together with several other loans they purchased [with your tax dollars] and sell them as a package to some investor.
    Since the CRA, the bank doesn't really care if Mr. & Mrs Bluecollar can repay the loan because they know they will get their money from Fannie or Freddy. Ms. Mae and Mr. Mac don't care either, because they know they can pawn it off on some unsuspecting investor who (quite incorrectly) believes that, since they came from the a supposed-government agency (since 1968, Fannie has been public) the package has to be a good investment.
WRONG!!!
    Now the investors are stuck with a bunch of bad debts and foreclosed homes; known as Toxic Assets6 . They (the investors) lose a bunch of money. They don't want and won't buy any more of these money-losing packages, which leaves Fannie and Freddy stuck with a few BILLION dollars worth of toxic assets and now they can't buy any more mortgages from the banks. The banks can't collect the loans back from people who can't afford the payments so they go bankrupt. The FDIC7 has to bail out the banks8 with more of your tax dollars and the whole thing spirals down to what we have today. More people demanding more free help from the government that has less money because more businesses close down and the ones that remain have less profit so they pay less taxes. Banks are belly-up so businesses can't borrow money so they can't hire more people so unemployment goes up so less people can afford a house so more banks have more foreclosed homes so...ad nauseam!

    And just exactly what does all that mean for you, your family and the future?
The good news is that, if history is a reliable indicator, things will get better; and probably before the USA goes the way of Greece. The bad news is that it WILL get worse before it gets better.
    WordPress.com says “The housing market won’t recover until employment increases and consumers become more confident.9And, according to the San Francisco Chronicle “"When things turn and there is job growth and there is consumer confidence back, then we'll see a change," said Douglas Yearley, chief executive officer of luxury builder Toll Bros. Inc. "We have to get job growth back.10"
    In other words, until people THINK there is a recovery, there won't be one. Once Americans start to believe that things are getting better, they will spend more of what little money they have. That will bring more capitol into businesses who will then begin to hire more people. Less unemployment will mean even more consumer confidence which will mean more spending which will mean more growth and more taxes collected to help people that haven't caught up yet. With more growth, housing prices will start to recover and more people will have jobs and be able to afford to buy a home.

    Someone once told me that it is easier to act yourself into a new way of thinking than to think yourself into a new way of acting.
    Apparently we are going to have to do it the hard way. We have to believe in our recovery first. Then and only then will there actually be a recovery.


At least, that's my opinion. Let us know what you think.




Citations
5 A savings and loan association (or S&L), also known as a thrift, is a financial institution that specializes in accepting
savings deposits and making mortgage and other loans.

If you wish to unsubscribe from this blog, please send an email to pyrate02@gmail.com with the word “UNSUBSCRIBE”in the subject line.

22 March 2012

CITIZEN OR SUBJECT?


      It seems like my monthly postings keeps coming later and later in the month. I do apologise and next month I'll do my damnedest to have it to you by the 5th. This time I really do have a valid reason, though. Two, actually.
     First, there are so many things going on I was having a hard time deciding which one deserves the time to research. I finally settled on this month's topic, sat down to write it and that day my wife had a heart attack. A trip to the ER and the fear of possibly losing my best friend put everything else on hold. While we were dealing with all that that entails, my computer crashed. I thought I had everything backed up. That's what I get for thinking; I didn't double-check the output of my back-up program. There is a lesson in there somewhere.
      BTW; my wife is ok now. Making a few life-style changes and slowin' down a bit but back home and doing well.
      So now I have redone all of my research for this month's topic: The 2nd amendment and some recent court cases and decisions about it.


Here it is in all it's simplicity and glory. 
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

      This simple, one-sentence part of our constitution has caused more controversy than almost any other legal statement in the history of our great country.
Let's get a bit of historical context.
      A lot of people in this country think that we should have European-style gun laws. They point, quite correctly, to a direct correlation between the very restrictive European laws and most of Europe's very low incidence of gun violence. What these good citizens completely ignore is over 300 years of history and culture.
      Most European countries are hundreds, if not thousands of years old. In their entire history the military were the only ones allowed to posses any more armament than a dagger. Ordinary citizens were simply forbidden from possessing weaponry. That is all they know.
      On the other hand, since the first explorers and settlers landed on America's shores; a century or two before we became a sovereign nation, EVERYBODY had a gun. They (guns) were an absolute necessity for survival both from a view of self defence and for putting food on the table. Even the Quakers and Pilgrims all had guns. Our entire history has been written with the average person being armed.
      In that light, any attempt to disarm our population succeeds only in either disarming the law-abiding citizenry or – if they refuse to give up their ability to defend themselves and their families - making criminals out of them. On the other hand the bad guys, by their very nature, don't pay any attention to the laws in the first place and they keep their guns. Or get more of them. I seriously doubt that any law passed anywhere has ever made a criminal give up his gun.

      So that brings us to this months' topic. What have the courts been deciding recently in regards to the 2nd amendment?

#1 Until 2008, probably the biggest point of disagreement about the 2nd amendment were the first 4 words. Does the statement: “A well regulated militia” refer to the individual or to the national guard? That question has finally been settled. At least for now.
      On 6/26/'08 in District of Columbia v. Heller1, the supreme court held in part : The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defence within the home.
      Arguably, the most important part of this decision was 1b that reads:
The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defence. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicised standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp. 22–28. “
      That reminds me of the old adage: “An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed one a subject.” Obviously, that is what our wise [er than me] founding fathers had in mind.

#2 On June 28th, 2010, the supreme court ruled on McDonald v. Chicago2 , expanding on DC v Heller and stating that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms" protected by the Second Amendment is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to individual states as well as the Federal Government. In a nutshell, that means that states have to follow the federal constitution as well as their own and that federal trumps state.
      In explaining the Chicago decision, Justice Alito stated "It is clear that the Framers . . . counted the right to keep and bear arms among those fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty."

#3 A Maryland law restricting carrying outside the home has been struck down. U.S. District Court Judge Benson E. Legg has declared the requirement forcing those applying for a gun-carry permit to show that they have a "good and substantial reason" to do so "impermissibly infringes the right to keep and bear arms," as guaranteed by the Second Amendment3." The judge went on to say: "The right's existence is all the reason he needs."

#4 In Colorado, if you have a valid conceal carry permit, you can now carry even on a University campus. Thanks to the Students for Concealed Carry on Campus you can now protect yourself, at least in Colorado, from campus shooters4.

      At least 8 states have passed so-called “Firearms Freedom Acts”; laws that state “ any firearms made and retained in-state are beyond the authority of Congress under its constitutional power to regulate commerce among the states.5FFA s are an attempt to eventually end federal control over all gun laws within an individual state. South Carolina has actually done just that. In 2010 a bill was introduced in their state legislature which would effectively nullify all gun registration laws within the state6. Several more states are considering similar laws. How these laws will hold up to constitutional scrutiny is any body's guess


      In the news lately due to the shooting in Florida of an un-armed teenager, are the so-called Castle Doctrines7 of several states. A Castle Doctrine is an American legal doctrine that designates a person's abode (or, in some states, any place legally occupied, such as a car or place of work) as a place in which the person has certain protections and immunities and may in certain circumstances attack an intruder without becoming liable to prosecution. At least 22 states have some form of Castle Doctrine, with a few going even further and instituting a "Stand Your Ground" law8. These laws state that you have no duty to flee from an aggressor and that you are justified and indemnified from civil or criminal prosecution for using deadly force, even if you're in a public place and had a chance to leave and avoid the confrontation.      
     Stand Your Ground laws (sometimes known as "Make My Day" laws) are especially controversial; particularly in light of the Zimmerman shooting9.

      The Federalist Papers consist of a series of essays written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison explaining how this new government would operate and why this type of government was the best choice for the United States of America.
      In the Federalist papers # 46, founding father James Madison put the entire need-to-be-armed subject in context when he wrote: “Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms10.

      Although many people in the last hundred-or-so years have tried to say that the need to maintain a militia of “all males physically capable of bearing arms” is no longer valid since we have the national guard and a constant standing army, the courts keep upholding an individuals' right to own guns. As one Supreme Court justice-whose name I can't remember- put it (I am quoting from memory so this is a paraphrase) “The 2nd amendment is there in case the courts, military and law enforcement forget about the other 9.”
      Former president Bill Clinton not withstanding, the right to keep and bear arms has nothing to do with hunting ducks. It is a vital part of our way of life; necessary to keep a free people free and to guarantee that the Federal Government won't decide to throw out the constitution and turn us all into subjects and serfs.


At least that's my opinion. What's yours?

To keep an eye on upcoming court cases involving the 2nd amendment to our constitution, visit the Second Amendment Foundation's web site at:
For the complete text of the Constitution of the United States, visit:
If you would like to download and print a nice-looking copy of the Constitution and/or our Declaration of Independence, go to:


Citations

1 http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html

http://gunssavelives.net/blog/huge-court-victory-for-expanding-second-amendment-rights-by-saf/
http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fedpapers.html

If you wish to unsubscribe from this blog, please send an email to pyrate02@gmail.com with the word “UNSUBSCRIBE”in the subject line.


16 February 2012

LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE


    Last night, as my wife and I were watching the news, she asked me what a Liberal or Conservative actually is. As I made a gallant but futile attempt at defining them for her, I realised that I'm just like Potter Stewart (supreme court judge; 1958 to 1981) who, when referring to pornography, said "I shall not today attempt further to define (the kinds of material) I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it...1
    The February 13th issue of Time® Magazine has an article titled “WHAT IS A CONSERVATIVE?”. 3 pages of commentaries by 9 different authors and they all seemed to articulate what a Conservative ISN'T, with absolutely no consensus on what one IS! I will assume that they would be similarly as inconsistent if they tried defining a Liberal.
    On that note, and with one of the most important elections of the last 100 years coming up in just 9 months, I decided to try my hand at coming up with a solid definition for each term.

    If you have been reading this blog for any length of time, you know where I stand on most social, economic and political issues; I have always considered myself to be a staunch right-wing Conservative and try to espouse those values and ideals. However, like Justice Potter, I really don't have a solid definition. I just know them when I see them.
    So I did a bunch of research and here I bring to you my shot at putting forth true, accurate definitions for the terms Liberal and Conservative.

Liberal: lib·er·al/ˈlib(ə)rəl/ Adjective: Open to new behaviour or opinions and willing to discard traditional values.

Answers.com has this to say:
Liberals believe that individuals are collectively responsible for the welfare of the entire community. Thus more programs to help the entire community means that higher taxes and bigger government is needed to oversee the programs.
  • Pro-choice
  • Equality
  • Feminism
  • Affirmative Action
  • Gun Regulation
  • Social Help
  • Insurance that covers all
  • Support welfare program
  • Separation of church and state-No religion in schools
  • Against the death penalty
  • Regulated Market
Ask.com says:
Liberals don't love to pay taxes, but they stress that a well-functioning government has a responsibility to maintain law and order, and that doing this is costly. Liberals stress that taxes are necessary for providing police and courts, ensuring safe transportation by building safe roads, promoting education by providing public schools, and protecting society in general by providing health care to those who need it.

    In an article by Robert S. Sargent, Jr titled “Understanding the Liberal agenda2, I believe I found the best non-Conservative-biased definition. Even though he is an obvious conservative, he seems to attempt to offer a truthful, straight-forward view. It the article he says: 

...what is the underlying principle that drives the Liberal (not Democratic) agenda? I'm convinced it's egalitarianism. It is a constant drive toward equality.
And:
Egalitarianism means everybody is equal, and that must be instituted from a central source: the Federal Government.

   And from  StudentNewsDaily3 we get what is probably the most definitive, in-depth and side-by-side comparison, which begins (for the Liberal side):
Liberals – believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all.  It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights.  Believe the role of the government should be to guarantee that no one is in need. Liberal policies generally emphasise the need for the government to solve problems.

Now onward to:
Conservative: /kənˈsərvətiv/ Adjective: Holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in politics or religion.


For the Conservatives, Answers.com says:
Conservatives believe that individuals are responsible for themselves, and that the community benefits from the efforts of the individuals acting in their interests. Thus less governmental programs, less taxes, and less government is the goal.
  • Pro-life
  • Equality takes a back seat
  • Patriarchal
  • Believe there is reverse racism in affirmative action
  • No Gun Regulation
  • No social help
  • No separation of church and state
  • Religion in public schools
  • Support the death penalty
  • Free Market
And we get this from Ask.com.
Conservatives generally value individual accomplishment and resent too much government intervention. They do not believe that it is the job of the government to solve the problems of society by imposing intrusive or costly policies, such as affirmative action or mandatory health care programs.

The Conservative side of the StudentDailyNews.com3 comparison says:
CONSERVATIVES – believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values and a strong national defence.  Believe the role of government should be to provide people the freedom necessary to pursue their own goals. Conservative policies generally emphasise empowerment of the individual to solve problems.”

While assisting me in the research for this posting, my son said: “For what it's worth, here is why I call myself an independent.

    It has been said many times that; if you want to keep peace in a crowd, never discuss politics or religion. I hope this discussion doesn't start any brawls. I just wanted to bring a little clarification to what seem to be some very muddy waters. I hope I succeeded. And...I hope that, the next time someone tells you that they are a Liberal or Conservative, you know exactly what they are claiming to believe. Or at least what somebody else thinks they claim to believe. Or what the other side wants to believe they believe. Or...Ahh! To hell with it. For better or worse; there it is.

    One more thing. I'll be the first to admit that our laws, our government and even our country are not perfect. Sometimes our laws don't work quite like we think...or wish they would (see my posting: 01 June 2011-THE HIJACKING OF THE WHITE-HOUSE - WHO REALLY CHOOSES OUR PRESIDENT?) But the ballot box is the backbone – the very lifeblood of our republic. I'm not trying to get anybody to vote or believe one way or another. Whether you consider yourself a Liberal, Conservative or Progressive; whether you think of yourself as a Socialist or a Constitutionalist; please vote. Do your part to make us better. And to keep us the best country in the world. It only takes a few minutes every other year. Please! Just vote.



    Besides if you don't vote, you have no room to complain if things don't end up the way you wanted.

At least, that's my opinion. What's yours?

PS: for a little more incentive to get out the vote, please read my posting from 04 November 2011 titled
A SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM


Citations


If you wish to unsubscribe from this blog, please send an email to pyrate02@gmail.com with the word “UNSUBSCRIBE”in the subject line.